Current:Home > MarketsAbortion-rights measure will be on Missouri’s November ballot, court rules -InvestSmart Insights
Abortion-rights measure will be on Missouri’s November ballot, court rules
View
Date:2025-04-17 07:56:19
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) — A measure undoing Missouri’s near-total abortion ban will appear on the ballot in November, the state’s high court ruled Tuesday, marking the latest victory in a nationwide fight to have voters weigh in on abortion laws since federal rights to the procedure ended in 2022.
If passed, the proposal would enshrine abortion rights in the constitution and is expected to broadly supplant the state’s near-total abortion ban. Judges ruled hours before the Tuesday deadline for changes to be made to the November ballot.
Supreme Court judges ordered Republican Secretary of State Jay Ashcroft to put the measure back on the ballot. He had removed it Monday following a county circuit judge’s ruling Friday.
The order also directs Ashcroft, an abortion opponent, to “take all steps necessary to ensure that it is on said ballot.”
Secretary of State’s Office spokesman JoDonn Chaney in an email said the Secretary of State’s Office is putting the amendment on the ballot, although Ashcroft in a statement said he’s “disappointed” with the ruling.
The court’s full opinion on the case was not immediately released Tuesday.
Missourians for Constitutional Freedom, the campaign backing the measure, lauded the decision.
“Missourians overwhelmingly support reproductive rights, including access to abortion, birth control, and miscarriage care,” campaign manager Rachel Sweet said in a statement. “Now, they will have the chance to enshrine these protections in the Missouri Constitution on November 5.”
Mary Catherine Martin, a lawyer for a group of GOP lawmakers and abortion opponents suing to remove the amendment, had told Supreme Court judges during rushed Tuesday arguments that the initiative petition “misled voters” by not listing all the laws restricting abortion that it would effectively repeal.
“This Missouri Supreme Court turned a blind eye and ruled Missourians don’t have to be fully informed about the laws their votes may overturn before signing initiative petitions,” the plaintiffs said in a statement after the decision.
Missouri banned almost all abortions immediately after the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022.
Eight other states will consider constitutional amendments enshrining abortion rights, including Arizona, Colorado, Florida, Maryland, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada and South Dakota. Most would guarantee a right to abortion until fetal viability and allow it later for the health of the pregnant woman, which is what the Missouri proposal would do.
New York also has a ballot measure that proponents say would protect abortion rights, though there’s a dispute about its impact.
Voting on the polarizing issue could draw more people to the polls, potentially impacting results for the presidency in swing states, control of Congress and the outcomes for closely contested state offices. Missouri Democrats, for instance, hope to get a boost from abortion-rights supporters during the November election.
Legal fights have sprung up across the country over whether to allow voters to decide these questions — and over the exact wording used on the ballots and explanatory material. In August, Arkansas’ highest court upheld a decision to keep an abortion rights initiative off the state’s November ballot, agreeing with election officials that the group behind the measure did not properly submit documentation regarding the signature gatherers it hired.
Voters in all seven states that have had abortion questions on their ballots since Roe was overturned have sided with abortion-rights supporters.
___
This story has been corrected to show that eight states outside Missouri will consider constitutional amendments enshrining abortion rights, not nine.
___
Associated Press reporter David A. Lieb contributed to this report.
veryGood! (747)
Related
- Person accused of accosting Rep. Nancy Mace at Capitol pleads not guilty to assault charge
- Why Diddy is facing 'apocalyptic' legal challenges amid 6 new sexual assault civil suits
- Concerns for Ryan Day, Georgia and Alabama entering Week 7. College Football Fix discusses
- Breanna Stewart condemns 'homophobic death threats' sent to wife after WNBA Finals loss
- Warm inflation data keep S&P 500, Dow, Nasdaq under wraps before Fed meeting next week
- Concerns for Ryan Day, Georgia and Alabama entering Week 7. College Football Fix discusses
- Texas man facing execution in shaken baby syndrome case awaits clemency ruling
- Navajo leader calls for tribal vice president’s resignation amid political upheaval
- Federal hiring is about to get the Trump treatment
- McCormick and Casey disagree on abortion, guns and energy in their last debate
Ranking
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- Republicans challenge more than 63,000 voters in Georgia, but few removed, AP finds
- Kristen Bell Admits to Sneaking NSFW Joke Into Frozen
- Horoscopes Today, October 16, 2024
- Rolling Loud 2024: Lineup, how to stream the world's largest hip hop music festival
- Preparing for the Launch of the AI Genius Trading Bot: Mark Jenkins' Strategic Planning
- Taylor Swift Assists With “Memories of a Lifetime” for Kansas City Chiefs Alum’s Daughter
- Dunkin' Munchkins Bucket and Halloween menu available this week: Here's what to know
Recommendation
Former longtime South Carolina congressman John Spratt dies at 82
Hunter Biden revives lawsuit against Fox News over explicit images used in streaming series
Idaho will begin using deep veins as backup for lethal injection executions, officials say
Los Angeles Archdiocese agrees to pay $880 million to settle sexual abuse claims
'No Good Deed': Who's the killer in the Netflix comedy? And will there be a Season 2?
Mexico vs. USMNT live updates, highlights: Cesar Huerta, Raul Jimenez have El Tri in lead
Supporting Children's Education: Mark's Path of Philanthropy
Eva Mendes has a message about food dyes in cereal. People are mad, but is she right?